Initial Encounter
- Bad stop
- No RAS
- Unconstitutional checkpoint
- Accident / Asleep at wheel – Officer didn’t observe you driving
- State can only prove driving with circumstantial evidence
- If you are sleeping in a vehicle
- Or if you were involved in a wreck outside the presence of any witnesses
- Public Street/Highway/PVA
- Private road?
- Driveway?
- Field?
- Unreasonably long detention
- Rodriguez
- RAS to pull out of vehicle for SFSTs
Roadside Investigation
- Unlawful Arrest
- Insufficient evidence of impairment to establish PC
- No SFSTs administered
- SFSTs incorrectly administered
- Officer not properly trained
- Officer training outdated
- Officer in need of refresher course
- Weather affected test
- Subject too old or too obese
- Officer not qualified to testify about SFSTs
- Medical issues mimicking impairing
- Driving while fatigued
- Portable Breath Test not properly administered/calibrated
Post-Arrest
- Lack of reasonable grounds to request breath test
- Issues with administration of breath test
- Officer did not properly advise driver of his or her rights
- Officer not did not follow rules and methods
- Suspect was not allowed to contact witness/attorney
- Witness/attorney called by defendant not allowed access to defendant
- Defendant was not allowed access to cell phone to retrieve contact information
- Issues with EC/IR-II
- There were technical issues with the machine
- Machine was not calibrated
- A new test tube was not used
- There were environmental factors that affected the machine
- Had an object in mouth during test
- Consumed something during observation period
- Medical conditions
- Asthma
- GERD
- Blood test
- Was blood lawfully obtained?
- Consent
- Exigent Circumstances
- Search warrant
- Were you ready your implied consent rights?
- Were you allowed to call an attorney or witness?
- Was the witness given enough time to get to hospital/jail?
- Was the witness denied access to you once they got to the hospital/jail?
- Did a qualified person draw your blood?
- Was the blood kit used expired?
- Chain of Custody?
- Was the blood appropriately collected?
- Was the blood properly sealed and packaged?
- Was the blood kit properly stored?
- Who had access to the blood kit?
- Was there an opportunity for someone to access and possibly tamper with the blood?
- How did the blood get to the lab?
- How long did it take the blood to get to the lab?
- Was the chain of custody of the blood documented?
- Was the blood kit intact when it arrived at the lab?
- Blood analysis?
- What method was used to test the blood?
- Chemical reaction with any preservatives or anticoagulants in the vials?
- Fermentation of the blood?
- Was the lab accredited?
- Was blood lawfully obtained?
- Magistrate
- Defendant’s conditions of release were unreasonable
- Defendant’s witnesses were denied timely access to observe the defendant
- Double Jeopardy
- A mistake by some government agent may result in the defendant getting punished twice.
- Unlawful vehicle seizure
- Unlawful license suspension
- Getting arrested for a clerical error
- A mistake by some government agent may result in the defendant getting punished twice.
In Court Issues
- Speedy Trial
- Unreasonable delay
- Brady violation
- Evidence not turned over
- Evidence destroyed
- Giglio violation
- Evidence of officer’s prior untruthfulness not turned over